Short answer: Every skip tracing tool advertises a match rate near ninety percent. That number counts records where something was returned, not records where you reached the right person. Test on your own list or you are buying a marketing claim.
- Match rate is not contact rate. The gap between them is where your money goes.
- Run the same 50 records through 2 or 3 providers. Regional variation is larger than brand difference.
- Per record pricing punishes bad lists. Clean the list before you trace it, not after.
- Check the permissible use agreement. A provider that does not make you sign one is a warning.
Skip tracing software is a commodity with a marketing problem. The underlying data comes from a small number of aggregators, so competing tools frequently return overlapping results, then differentiate on interface, integrations and price.
Which means the comparison that matters is not feature lists. It is what each one returns on your list.
Contents
Match rate versus contact rate
“90% match rate” = something was returned
What you care about
Numbers that ring the right person always materially lower
What you should measure
Cost per conversation, not cost per record
A provider returning three numbers per record looks generous until you discover two are disconnected and one belongs to a relative. Another returning a single accurate mobile is worth more and will score worse on the headline metric.
How to run a fair test
- Take fifty real records from the list you actually intend to work, not a sample the vendor picked.
- Run the identical fifty through each provider on trial credits.
- Count reached the right person, not numbers returned.
- Note the overlap. If two providers return the same data, buy the cheaper one.
- Repeat in a second market if you work more than one. Regional strength varies more than vendors admit.
- Divide total spend by real conversations. That is your only honest comparison number.
How the pricing models differ
| Model | Fits | Where it bites |
|---|---|---|
| Per record, pay as you go | Low volume, testing | Highest unit cost. Fine until you scale. |
| Monthly subscription with allowance | Steady predictable volume | Unused allowance rarely rolls over. |
| Bulk upload tiers | Large lists at once | Rewards volume, punishes bad list hygiene. |
| Bundled inside a CRM | Convenience | Convenient and rarely the best data. Test it anyway. |
Deduplicate and validate addresses before you upload. Most people pay to trace the same owner three times because the same person appears under three spellings, and every one of those is billed.
Features that genuinely matter
- Bulk upload and export in a format your CRM accepts without manual reshaping.
- DNC flagging, so you are not scrubbing separately.
- Litigator flagging. Some providers mark known TCPA plaintiffs. That feature can pay for the subscription in one avoided claim.
- Confidence scoring per number, so you call the best one first.
- Relative and associate data, which is what solves deceased owner and heir cases.
What this data legally is, and is not
Skip tracing data sold to investors is almost always non-FCRA data. That is not a loophole, it is a category.
| Law | What it restricts | What it means for you |
|---|---|---|
| FCRA | Use of consumer report data for credit, insurance, employment and tenant screening decisions | You may not use investor skip trace data to screen a tenant or a buyer’s creditworthiness. Different product, different permissible purpose. |
| DPPA | Use of state motor vehicle record data | DMV sourced data has a restricted list of permitted uses. Marketing to homeowners is generally not among them. |
| GLBA | Non public personal financial information | Constrains what financial data a provider can resell and for what purpose. |
| TCPA | Calls and texts to the numbers you just found | The live risk. See the section above. |
Reputable providers make you accept a permissible use agreement before they release data. If a provider does not ask, that is a signal about the provider rather than a convenience.
The number is the easy part. Calling it is the risk.
Skip tracing gets you a phone number. What you are allowed to do with it is a separate question, and it got harder in 2026.
In Coffey v. Fast Easy Offer (Ninth Circuit, 4 June 2026) the court revived TCPA claims over “we buy houses” calls and texts. The district court had thrown the case out on the theory that offering to buy a house is not a solicitation to sell anything. The Ninth Circuit disagreed, holding that the sender’s purpose matters, and that where unconverted leads are handed to a brokerage under a revenue share, the communication can be a telephone solicitation after all.
The practical consequence for wholesalers is direct. The old comfort that buy side outreach sits outside the TCPA is no longer safe in the Ninth Circuit, and the reasoning is available to plaintiffs elsewhere. If you skip trace a list and then blast it, you are relying on a defence that has just been narrowed.
- Skip traced numbers are overwhelmingly cell phones. That is the point of skip tracing, and it is also what raises the exposure.
- The National Do Not Call Registry still applies to telephone solicitations. Scrub against it rather than assuming your data provider did.
- What you do with dead leads matters. Coffey turned partly on referring unconverted sellers to a brokerage for a share of revenue. If your business does that, read the opinion with counsel.
- Consent is the safe path. Direct mail first, inbound response second, phone contact after that. Slower, and far more defensible.
Frequently asked questions
What is the best skip tracing software?
There is no single answer, because providers draw on overlapping data and perform differently by region and property type. Run the same fifty records through two or three on trial credits and compare how many produced a real conversation.
Why do two tools return different numbers for the same person?
They license different combinations of aggregated data and weight recency differently. This is exactly why testing on your own list beats reading comparison articles, including this one.
What does skip tracing cost?
Pricing is usually a few cents to a few dollars per record depending on volume and model. The more useful figure is cost per conversation, which folds in hit rate and is the only number that compares providers fairly.
Do these tools scrub the Do Not Call registry?
Some flag it, many do not, and flagging is not the same as compliance. Confirm what your provider actually does rather than assuming, because the obligation is yours.
Is a litigator scrub worth paying for?
If you make outbound calls or texts at volume, it is one of the few features that can pay for itself outright. Known serial TCPA plaintiffs are a real and avoidable category of risk.
Can I use skip tracing software for tenant screening?
No. That is an FCRA regulated purpose requiring a consumer reporting product with proper disclosures and consent. Investor skip trace data is sold as non-FCRA data.
Buy the data that produces conversations
Choosing a provider is a twenty minute test most people never run, and it is the difference between a list that pays and a subscription that quietly bleeds. Inside the free group we compare what is actually working right now. 1,100 wholesalers already in there. No cash, no credit, no license needed.
Join the free groupSources
Coffey v. Fast Easy Offer, LLC, No. 25-4066 (9th Cir. 4 June 2026)
Telephone Consumer Protection Act and National Do Not Call Registry rules
Fair Credit Reporting Act permissible purpose provisions
Driver’s Privacy Protection Act and Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act
This article explains common practice and is not legal advice. Contract law, disclosure duties and wholesaler licensing rules vary by state and change often. Have a real estate attorney licensed in your state review any agreement before you sign or use it.